Due to some hitches experienced on JAMB change of course and institution portal lately, the 2016 JAMB Change of Course and Institution has been extended.
However, this extension will not be long. The official closing date for 2016 JAMB Change of course/institution is on Friday 13th, May 2016.There will be no further extension.
We understand that many candidates are waiting to know the cut-off marks of their respective institutions before making the decision on whether or not to go for change of course and institution. However, many of this institution usually wait until announcing their post-UTME sales of forms to make known their cut-off marks.
If you wait that long, you may have only succeeded in putting yourself in an unfavourable position because change of course and institution would have been very much over by that time.
So what you should rather do is make your decision based on the previous Post-UTME cut off marks of these institutions and effect the necessary changes immediately.
Monday, 9 May 2016
UNILORIN 3rd Batch Remedial Admission List 2015/2016 Released
This is to notify candidates who have applied for 2015/2016 Remedial programme of the University of Ilorin (UNILORIN) that the 3rd batch list of admitted students have been released.
Candidates are to check their admission status by visiting http://www.remedial.unilorin.edu.ng/
Click on Remedial Login link and login with your Remedial Application Number e.g. UIL/REM/2015/… and your password).
For registration procedure, visit UNILORIN Remedial Registration Details
Candidates are to check their admission status by visiting http://www.remedial.unilorin.edu.ng/
Click on Remedial Login link and login with your Remedial Application Number e.g. UIL/REM/2015/… and your password).
For registration procedure, visit UNILORIN Remedial Registration Details
Post-UTME 2016: List Of Schools That Have Released Forms
The list will be updated as other schools announce their 2016 post-UTME. You are therefore advised to visit this thread regularly.
Christopher University Post-UTME 2016: Date, Eligibility, Screening And Registration Details
Bingham University Post-UTME/DE 2016: Date, Eligibility, Screening And Registration Details
Achievers University Post-UTME/DE 2016: Date, Eligibility, Screening And Registration Details
JABU Post-UTME/DE 2016: Eligibility And Registration Details
Crown Polytechnic Admission (ND/HND) 2016/2017 Announced
ABUAD Post-UTME/DE 2016: Eligibility And Registration Details
OOU Post-UTME/DE 2016: Screening Date, Cut-off Mark, Eligibility And Registration Details
Veritas University Post-UTME/DE 2016: Cut-off Mark, Eligibility And Registration Details
Bowen University Post-UTME 2016: Date, Eligibility, Screening And Registration Details
Bells University Post-UTME 2016: Date, Eligibility And Registration Details
Babcock University Post-UTME 2016: Eligibility, Date And Registration Details
Pan-Atlantic University Post-UTME 2016: Eligibility, Date And Registration Details
Igbinedion University Post-UTME 2016 Eligibility And Registration Details
KWASU Post-UTME/DE 2016: Eligibility, Screening Date And Registration Details
Nigerian Police Academy Application Into 4th Regular Course Degree Programme 2016/2017
NDA 68th Regular Course Application Announced
Covenant University Post-UTME 2016: Date, Eligibility And Registration Details
Redeemer's University Post-UTME Registration 2016/2017 Announced
Landmark University Post-UTME Registration 2016/2017 Announced
Ajayi Crowther University Post-UTME/DE Registration And Screening 2016/2017 Announced
Christopher University Post-UTME 2016: Date, Eligibility, Screening And Registration Details
Bingham University Post-UTME/DE 2016: Date, Eligibility, Screening And Registration Details
Achievers University Post-UTME/DE 2016: Date, Eligibility, Screening And Registration Details
JABU Post-UTME/DE 2016: Eligibility And Registration Details
Crown Polytechnic Admission (ND/HND) 2016/2017 Announced
ABUAD Post-UTME/DE 2016: Eligibility And Registration Details
OOU Post-UTME/DE 2016: Screening Date, Cut-off Mark, Eligibility And Registration Details
Veritas University Post-UTME/DE 2016: Cut-off Mark, Eligibility And Registration Details
Bowen University Post-UTME 2016: Date, Eligibility, Screening And Registration Details
Bells University Post-UTME 2016: Date, Eligibility And Registration Details
Babcock University Post-UTME 2016: Eligibility, Date And Registration Details
Pan-Atlantic University Post-UTME 2016: Eligibility, Date And Registration Details
Igbinedion University Post-UTME 2016 Eligibility And Registration Details
KWASU Post-UTME/DE 2016: Eligibility, Screening Date And Registration Details
Nigerian Police Academy Application Into 4th Regular Course Degree Programme 2016/2017
NDA 68th Regular Course Application Announced
Covenant University Post-UTME 2016: Date, Eligibility And Registration Details
Redeemer's University Post-UTME Registration 2016/2017 Announced
Landmark University Post-UTME Registration 2016/2017 Announced
Ajayi Crowther University Post-UTME/DE Registration And Screening 2016/2017 Announced
Sunday, 3 April 2016
JAMB To Announce 2016 Official Cut-off Marks For Institutions By June
THE Joint Admission and Matriculation Board, JAMB, has disclosed that
the cut-off marks for universities and polytechnics will be made public
in June, 2016.
This was made known by the Public Relations Officer of the board, Dr Fabian Benjamin.
In his words, “JAMB will officially publish the 2016 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME), cut-off marks for universities and polytechnics and Colleges of education in June.”
To get a clear idea about what the JAMB official cut off mark actually means and decide whether or not you need to apply for JAMB Change of course and institution, visit this link: JAMB Official Cut-Off Mark: What It Actually Means
JAMB Change of Course or Institution 2016/2017 has begun. Click here to Apply
This was made known by the Public Relations Officer of the board, Dr Fabian Benjamin.
In his words, “JAMB will officially publish the 2016 Unified Tertiary Matriculation Examination (UTME), cut-off marks for universities and polytechnics and Colleges of education in June.”
To get a clear idea about what the JAMB official cut off mark actually means and decide whether or not you need to apply for JAMB Change of course and institution, visit this link: JAMB Official Cut-Off Mark: What It Actually Means
JAMB Change of Course or Institution 2016/2017 has begun. Click here to Apply
Thursday, 24 March 2016
YABATECH Expels Six Final Year Students For Result Forgery
Six students of Yaba College of Technology have been expelled for
presenting fake or altered National Diploma (ND) and National
Certificate of Education (NCE) results for admission.
This was contained in a circular signed by the Deputy Registrar of the institution Mrs Taiwo Obadimu.
The students who were in the departments of Food Technology, Mathematics and Integrated Science, Physics Education, Estate Management and Valuation, Industrial Technical Education and Industrial Maintenance Engineering were directed by the circular to hand over all college property, including student identity cards in their possession, to the heads of their department, the Polytechnic Librarian and the Dean of Students’ Affairs, with immediate effect.
This was contained in a circular signed by the Deputy Registrar of the institution Mrs Taiwo Obadimu.
The students who were in the departments of Food Technology, Mathematics and Integrated Science, Physics Education, Estate Management and Valuation, Industrial Technical Education and Industrial Maintenance Engineering were directed by the circular to hand over all college property, including student identity cards in their possession, to the heads of their department, the Polytechnic Librarian and the Dean of Students’ Affairs, with immediate effect.
House of Reps Backtracks, Endorses JAMB CBT
The House of Representatives seems to be talking out of both sides of
its mouth with the recent report that it has endorsed the JAMB CBT.
It would be recalled that the Hose of Reps earlier directed that JAMB revert to the use of PPT or adopt the two and allow candidates make their choice.
In a recent development, the Chairman of the House Committee on Basic Education, Mr Zakari Muhammed, during a visit to one of the CBT centres, said the members of the House Committee on Basic Education have thrown their weight to the Computer-Based Test as it is part of the Federal Government’s plan to improve the education sector and in line with with global best practices.
In his words, “Basically, we need to be educated more. We are in support of the CBT and we cannot go back to paper-pencil; we must be in tandem with the world in the conduct of our examinations.
“The House (of Representatives) did not take any position on CBT, but there were fractions on the floor as to the adoption of both methods and I believe it is the reason why the House Committee on Basic Education was mandated to investigate. Nigeria cannot afford to maintain double standard as we know other African countries such as Uganda have been to our country to replicate our system such as the CBT.”.
Sources- My school.com
It would be recalled that the Hose of Reps earlier directed that JAMB revert to the use of PPT or adopt the two and allow candidates make their choice.
In a recent development, the Chairman of the House Committee on Basic Education, Mr Zakari Muhammed, during a visit to one of the CBT centres, said the members of the House Committee on Basic Education have thrown their weight to the Computer-Based Test as it is part of the Federal Government’s plan to improve the education sector and in line with with global best practices.
In his words, “Basically, we need to be educated more. We are in support of the CBT and we cannot go back to paper-pencil; we must be in tandem with the world in the conduct of our examinations.
“The House (of Representatives) did not take any position on CBT, but there were fractions on the floor as to the adoption of both methods and I believe it is the reason why the House Committee on Basic Education was mandated to investigate. Nigeria cannot afford to maintain double standard as we know other African countries such as Uganda have been to our country to replicate our system such as the CBT.”.
Sources- My school.com
Wednesday, 23 March 2016
JAMB used wrong software for 2016 UTME – Group
The Association of Tutorial School Operators (ATSO) has accused the
Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) of using the wrong
grading software to mark the 2016/2017 Unified Tertiary Matriculation
Examination (UTME).
The group claimed that the error was responsible for the poor and conflicting results that were released by the board for the examination written between February 27 and March 17 in over 500 centres nationwide.
Speaking at a press briefing in Lagos on Wednesday, President of the group, Shodunke Oludotun, alleged that the board erroneously used the software from last year to grade this year’s examination.
He called for the release of the right results, as well as the resignation of the JAMB Registrar, Prof ‘Dibu Ojerinde.
“We have our evidence to show that virtually all the candidates we have collected results of 2015/2016 and not of 2016/2017.
“This year, Prof Dibu Ojerinde advertised 2016/2017 UTME – we all saw it. During his press conference, he also mentioned 2016/2017. During the exam, the students on their monitor, it displayed 2016/2017. Why is it that the result that was sent to the students showed 2015/2016?
“From our findings from insiders in JAMB, we realized that the software of 2015/2016 interfered with the 2016/2017, which led to the massive failure of the students. If you can see the trend of results from (February) 27 to 29, the students failed; (March) 7-15, the students failed massively.
“But we noticed that the 27-29 were compensated with 40 marks still under the interference of software. We can see that the 2015/2016 software was used to mark, that was why the students were receiving 2015/2016 results. So where is 2016/2017 result? That is what we are asking Prof Dibu Ojerinde. We are saying that Prof Dibu Ojerinde should step aside.”
“This Association of Tutorial School Operators, we are not against CBT. CBT has really helped to bring more students to tutorial centres. It makes them to be serious; and we have taught them. But for CBT, the whole JAMB exam would have been messed up. Because before CBT, it will only take you N2,000 for Cyber cafĂ© to send the answers to you. So I want to say that we appreciate the professor for introducing the CBT; and we are in support of CBT,” he said.
Responding to ATSO’s allegations of software mishap, Dr. Fabian Benjamin, JAMB’s Director of Media and Public Relations, said whether 2010 or 2019 software was used, what was important was the programming and not the marking guide.
“I am not a programmer, but I can confirm to you that JAMB does not joke with its template. What happened with the 40 marks issue is because the scripts were marked based on 250 marks because only English Language is 100 while the other three papers carry 50 marks, making a total of 250.
“So when the first results were released, they were calculated based on 250, and after normalization we felt it would not be ideal for us to cheat on the candidates. So we had to quickly send them their real scores,” Benjamin stated.
He refuted claims that the House Committee on Education had ordered the board to revert to PPT. Onl the contrary, he said the committee praised JAMB for introducing the CBT.
“The House never considered ordering the examinationn to revert to PPT; individual members only raised suggestions,” he said.
The group claimed that the error was responsible for the poor and conflicting results that were released by the board for the examination written between February 27 and March 17 in over 500 centres nationwide.
Speaking at a press briefing in Lagos on Wednesday, President of the group, Shodunke Oludotun, alleged that the board erroneously used the software from last year to grade this year’s examination.
He called for the release of the right results, as well as the resignation of the JAMB Registrar, Prof ‘Dibu Ojerinde.
“We have our evidence to show that virtually all the candidates we have collected results of 2015/2016 and not of 2016/2017.
“This year, Prof Dibu Ojerinde advertised 2016/2017 UTME – we all saw it. During his press conference, he also mentioned 2016/2017. During the exam, the students on their monitor, it displayed 2016/2017. Why is it that the result that was sent to the students showed 2015/2016?
“From our findings from insiders in JAMB, we realized that the software of 2015/2016 interfered with the 2016/2017, which led to the massive failure of the students. If you can see the trend of results from (February) 27 to 29, the students failed; (March) 7-15, the students failed massively.
“But we noticed that the 27-29 were compensated with 40 marks still under the interference of software. We can see that the 2015/2016 software was used to mark, that was why the students were receiving 2015/2016 results. So where is 2016/2017 result? That is what we are asking Prof Dibu Ojerinde. We are saying that Prof Dibu Ojerinde should step aside.”
“This Association of Tutorial School Operators, we are not against CBT. CBT has really helped to bring more students to tutorial centres. It makes them to be serious; and we have taught them. But for CBT, the whole JAMB exam would have been messed up. Because before CBT, it will only take you N2,000 for Cyber cafĂ© to send the answers to you. So I want to say that we appreciate the professor for introducing the CBT; and we are in support of CBT,” he said.
Responding to ATSO’s allegations of software mishap, Dr. Fabian Benjamin, JAMB’s Director of Media and Public Relations, said whether 2010 or 2019 software was used, what was important was the programming and not the marking guide.
“I am not a programmer, but I can confirm to you that JAMB does not joke with its template. What happened with the 40 marks issue is because the scripts were marked based on 250 marks because only English Language is 100 while the other three papers carry 50 marks, making a total of 250.
“So when the first results were released, they were calculated based on 250, and after normalization we felt it would not be ideal for us to cheat on the candidates. So we had to quickly send them their real scores,” Benjamin stated.
He refuted claims that the House Committee on Education had ordered the board to revert to PPT. Onl the contrary, he said the committee praised JAMB for introducing the CBT.
“The House never considered ordering the examinationn to revert to PPT; individual members only raised suggestions,” he said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)